ESG factors: Who decides on disclosure?
Who should determine whether ESG factors are integrated into corporate decision-making? Should it solely be a company’s choice, or are the views of fund managers paramount?
Who should determine whether ESG factors are integrated into corporate decision-making? Should it solely be a company’s choice, or are the views of fund managers paramount?
Systemic racism is an ESG (environmental, social and governance) issue but the ESG investment community has failed to properly address it.
Ensuring environmental, social and governance factors ("ESG") are properly integrated into corporate decision making is what I'm putting my energies into.
Business needs to act to ensure that in a post coronavirus world a regulated, social market economy delivers the goods for more people. So CEOs need to become more vocal and activist in addressing ESG concerns, not less.
Business shouldn't junk the new found fervour for ESG in the pursuit of short term profit as soon as normality returns. Here's why.
Both morally and financially, the UK can't afford to miss out on becoming a leading force in the fight against the climate crisis.
Gone are the days of ignoring flaws in the current model. It will be a challenge, but pushing the stakeholder agenda forward isn’t just wise – it’s a necessity
So another era of Conservative government begins, with MPs being sworn in and the state opening of the new parliament later this week. It was a disappointing general election for my party, the Liberal Democrats, but that should not obscure the progress that was made. We gained 1.2 million more votes relative to 2017 with our vote share increasing by 4.2
Britain needs a sophisticated, multitrack approach to ensure these new technologies are used for the common good at home and abroad
The public have a choice. But in order to stop this calamity in its tracks, at the very least we must reduce the numbers of Conservative MPs
Statement following the result in the Cities of London & Westminster